Filed under: china

UK PM rejects China request to remove 'offensive' poppies

Globalized cultures running into one another in unexpected way:

David Cameron and four Cabinet ministers wore poppies in defiance of Chinese demands to remove them yesterday.

The Prime Minister was told that allowing his delegation to sport the symbol would cause grave offence because it would remind Chinese ministers and officials of the Opium Wars.

The British victories in both conflicts apparently still weigh heavy on Chinese minds, since the prospect of British ministers and officials wearing poppies while attending this week's talks in Beijing prompted horror.

The poppy is the source of opium and Chinese officials were apparently unfamiliar with its importance in Britain in commemorating our war dead.

 

China is like 1850s America

Responding to arguments that China is like Japan in the 1980s, two US historians compare China today to the United States in the 19th century.

Summary of 2010s China and 1850s US:

  • Predominantly rural, shifting rapidly to urban
  • “Workshop of the world” with cheap textiles, consumer goods, and weapons.
  • Low-cost, high-quality manufacturing success brings both criticism and praise from other states
  • Claims of dubious practices: currency manipulation, intellectual property abuse (reverse engineering, “piracy”)
  • Mythological contradictions (capitalism and communism, “One China”; 1850s US “freedom” and slavery, status of women, violence against indigenous Americans).

The authors note the preoccupation with China’s many current challenges, adding that mid-nineteenth century US faced major challenges, too — including economic crises and bubbles.

Useful comparison — to a point. The article helpfully makes the conversation transhistorical and pulls it outside a default view of global linear progress.

Michael Hudson: Finance as warfare

Michael Hudson: Well, the object of warfare is to take over a country’s land, raw materials and assets, and grab them. And in the past, that used to be done militarily by invading them. But today you can do it financially simply by creating credit, which is what the Federal Reserve has done...

So the purpose, according to the Fed, is to raise the price of real estate, to inflate asset prices. But that’s not happening. The actual banks have lent less today than they did in 2007. So the money is going abroad. And it’s going abroad not really to buy foreign companies so much, but to speculate in currency.

Full video at democracynow.org

 

"Low-carbon claims by Chinese cities are misleading"

From an interview with Jiang Kejun, senior researcher at the National Development and Reform Commission's Energy Research Institute:

You can describe [China's] current approach to city building as entirely mistaken. Look at Beijing – it's all wrong, from the buildings to the roads to the planning of zones. We build huge buildings but use little of the space. From the 1990s to 2005, Beijing encouraged car use. "Transportation development" just meant increasing average traffic speeds, for example from 14 kilometres per hour to 15 kilometres per hour. Another target is road surface area: officials are judged on how much the area devoted to roads has increased, and the more that happens, the less space there is for bikes and pedestrians.

But Beijing's city leaders still say that having more cars is a sign of modernity. Beijing once demolished its city walls. Now it's knocking down the 798 art district [an artist community in decommissioned factory buildings in Beijing's Chaoyang district]. It is making the same mistake all over again. But this approach represents the way of thinking of most Chinese people.