Filed under: power

Wikileaks forces hidden power to reveal itself

In a reluctant post on Wikileaks, Peter Hemminger relates the events to Foucault's belief that "the only way to confront the hidden power structures in society is to force them to act in a way that reveals their existence":

Any ideas that people had about free expression on the internet, about the value of a free press, about transparency and accountability, about unbiased educational standards, are all being called into question. Political figures who endorsed the value — and the necessity — of journalists pushing through government censorship are now calling for their government to censor journalists.

But this is what I mean. Five-hundred words in, and I still haven’t listed a day’s worth of facts, or addressed the content of the Wikileaks documents, or done much more than amass a collection of links. The only coherent picture I can make out of it all is exceedingly cynical about governments, media and corporate institutions, and overly idealistic about the people donating to Wikileaks, finding ways to circumvent the restrictions that the dominant power structures are imposing and becoming vocal about their dissatisfaction with a system that prizes largely pointless secrecy over truth and accountability.

In fact, the main reason I’m posting this is that the first time I thought about posting about it, I actually questioned whether doing so was in some way dangerous. And the fact that the atmosphere out there is such that it dissuades people from even entering a discussion — that the rhetoric from the government and politicians is having a legitimate chilling effect on the debate — is reason enough to get involved, even in a minor way.

This reaction by obscured or hidden power structures sees to be have been anticipated by Assange beforehand, described in essays from 2006.

The fear and passivity that the transborder state-corporate response is instilling among the public is visible -- not least in the above post, but even among my own friends. Some are quite concerned that they've donated in the past to Wikileaks, an organization that, so far, has been charged with no crime, is responsible for no deaths and is cooperating with major media corporations, but has troublingly exposed an obscured arrangement of violent global power. These events and reactions also expose the other side of the obscured power arrangement: an overwhelmingly passive and intimidated public, deeply worried about upsetting the normalcy of their everyday.

Taliban calls on US Congress to investigate US military

The Taliban, self-labelled the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, issued a statement to the US Congress, via Agence-France Press this week. They suggested Congress send a team to Afghanistan to investigate the “ground realities” that they say are being concealed by elements of the US military.

The team should have freedom of movement and should be allowed to remain far from the clutches of your intelligence agencies,“ it said, adding that US military leaders were unlikely to allow the team to do so. The statement accused US defence secretary Robert Gates, commander of foreign troops in Afghanistan US General David Petraeus, and other "military brass” of exaggerating battlefield successes to appear victorious and for financial gain…

Is this conventional behaviour for a group like the Taliban? It seems unusual to address the legislature directly and underlines complications with jurisdiction and authority in both the global and local scale of the conflict.